Last Updated on September 1, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

The Phoenix Mercury 2024 were powered by Kahleah Copper’s scoring, while Brittney Griner anchored the interior with efficient offense, rebounding, and rim protection. Natasha Cloud directed the offense as the primary playmaker and added defensive pressure, with Diana Taurasi providing perimeter shooting and secondary scoring. The Mercury featured balanced offensive contributors but struggled to consistently defend opponents and convert that talent into sustained team success.

Roster

NO. PLAYER NAME POS. HT. WT. BIRTH DATE COLLEGE
0 Natasha Cloud G 5-10 160 February 22, 1992 Maryland, Saint Joseph’s
1 Sug Sutton G 5-8 140 December 17, 1998 Texas
2 Kahleah Copper G-F 6-1 165 August 28, 1994 Rutgers University
3 Diana Taurasi G 6-0 163 June 11, 1982 UConn
4 Natasha Mack F-C 6-4 182 November 3, 1997 Angelina College, Oklahoma State
6 Celeste Taylor G 5-11 167 June 20, 2001 Texas, Duke, Ohio State
9 Sophie Cunningham G 6-1 156 August 16, 1996 Missouri
11 Rebecca Allen F-G 6-2 162 November 6, 1992  
20 Liz Dixon F 6-5 195 September 29, 2000 Georgia Tech, Louisville
21 Mikiah Herbert Harrigan F 6-2 152 August 21, 1998 South Carolina
25 Morgan Bertsch F 6-4 173 April 20, 1997 UC-Davis
42 Brittney Griner C 6-9 219 October 18, 1990 Baylor
  Amy Atwell F 6-0 165 June 30, 1998 Hawaii
  Monique Billings F 6-4 190 May 2, 1996 UCLA
  Charisma Osborne G 5-9 166 July 3, 2001 UCLA

Regular Season Per Game

PLAYER NAME POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Kahleah Copper 29 37 37 32.4 21.1 4.5 2.3 0.8 0.1 3.0 17.0 7.4 .435 5.9 1.9 .314 5.6 4.5 .807
Diana Taurasi 42 36 36 29.0 14.9 3.8 3.4 0.6 0.3 1.9 11.9 4.8 .400 7.2 2.4 .333 3.5 3.0 .857
Brittney Griner 33 30 30 28.7 17.8 6.6 2.3 0.5 1.5 1.8 12.6 7.3 .579 0.6 0.3 .500 3.7 2.9 .777
Natasha Cloud 32 38 38 33.3 11.5 4.1 6.9 1.4 0.6 3.0 10.1 4.0 .397 3.8 1.2 .308 2.9 2.4 .826
Sophie Cunningham 27 40 21 27.7 8.4 3.9 2.0 1.0 0.3 1.0 6.0 2.6 .429 4.5 1.7 .378 1.7 1.5 .870
Natasha Mack 26 40 11 15.5 3.8 5.0 1.1 0.7 1.2 0.7 3.1 1.8 .573 0.1 0.0 .000 0.5 0.3 .579
Rebecca Allen 31 18 18 24.8 7.4 3.9 1.1 0.9 0.7 1.0 7.0 2.9 .421 3.9 1.4 .357 0.2 0.1 .667
Mikiah Herbert Harrigan 25 31 3 10.8 3.2 1.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 2.8 1.1 .407 1.7 0.5 .321 0.6 0.4 .550
Sug Sutton 25 22 0 14.9 2.9 1.1 2.4 0.6 0.0 1.3 3.3 1.0 .306 1.7 0.5 .270 0.6 0.4 .692
Monique Billings 28 13 2 18.0 4.9 4.2 0.5 0.9 0.5 1.1 4.1 1.8 .434 0.5 0.2 .286 1.5 1.2 .800
Celeste Taylor 23 15 4 20.1 3.5 1.8 1.8 1.0 0.6 1.4 4.0 1.3 .317 2.0 0.4 .200 1.1 0.6 .563
Liz Dixon 23 17 0 9.4 1.8 2.4 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.5 1.7 0.6 .379 0.0 0.0   0.6 0.5 .800
Morgan Bertsch 27 8 0 9.8 2.6 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.1 3.4 0.8 .222 1.8 0.3 .143 1.0 0.9 .875
Amy Atwell 26 6 0 9.8 2.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 2.5 0.7 .267 2.2 0.5 .231 0.8 0.7 .800
Charisma Osborne 22 2 0 5.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 .500 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  

Playoff Per Game

PLAYER NAME POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Natasha Cloud G 32 2 2 36.5 24.5 5.5 10.0 1.0 0.5 3.0 17.5 9.5 .543 6.5 3.0 .462 3.0 2.5 .833
Brittney Griner C 33 2 2 29.5 17.0 5.5 0.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 12.5 6.5 .520 1.0 0.5 .500 5.0 3.5 .700
Diana Taurasi G 42 2 2 29.5 15.5 3.0 2.5 1.0 0.0 3.5 13.0 5.5 .423 9.0 3.5 .389 1.0 1.0 1.000
Kahleah Copper G 29 2 2 29.5 14.5 4.5 2.5 1.0 0.0 3.5 13.5 5.5 .407 5.5 2.0 .364 2.5 1.5 .600
Natasha Mack F 26 2 0 13.0 7.0 3.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 5.5 3.5 .636 0.0 0.0   0.5 0.0 .000
Sophie Cunningham G 27 2 2 31.5 6.5 4.5 3.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 5.0 2.5 .500 3.5 1.5 .429 0.0 0.0  
Monique Billings F 28 2 0 14.0 4.0 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.0 .800 0.0 0.0   0.5 0.0 .000
Celeste Taylor G 23 2 0 14.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 .667 1.0 0.5 .500 0.0 0.0  
Mikiah Herbert Harrigan F 25 2 0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  
Amy Atwell F 26 1 0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  

HeatingUp Impact Index: Regular Season Team Impact Spotlight

Player Name Role Tier MPG Usage Tier PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) Impact Index Notes Awards
Kahleah Copper Starter/Star (1.1) 32.4 High (1.2) 21.1 4.5 2.3 0.9 75.24 Took over as Phoenix’s primary scorer, attacking downhill relentlessly and forcing defenses to collapse before they were set. Independent season coverage frequently highlighted how the Mercury reshaped their offense around her pace, rim pressure and ability to generate difficult shots late in possessions. WNBA All-Star (2024); All-WNBA Second Team (2024)
Brittney Griner Starter/Star (1.1) 28.7 High (1.2) 17.8 6.6 2.3 2.0 75.50 Anchored both ends with efficient post scoring while remaining the team’s defensive backbone. Reporters consistently noted that Phoenix leaned on her interior presence to stabilize the offense and erase mistakes around the rim. WNBA All-Star (2024)
Diana Taurasi Starter/Star (1.1) 29.0 High (1.2) 14.9 3.8 3.4 0.9 60.19 Operated as the veteran organizer, balancing perimeter scoring with playmaking as the Mercury integrated new stars. Coverage regularly pointed to her leadership and ability to keep the offense connected even when her scoring volume fluctuated. WNBA All-Star (2024)
Natasha Cloud Starter/Star (1.1) 33.3 Medium (1.1) 11.5 4.1 6.9 2.0 59.73 Functioned as Phoenix’s lead facilitator, pushing tempo and creating quality looks while taking the toughest backcourt defensive assignments. Independent analysis often praised her defensive communication and willingness to organize the team on both ends. WNBA All-Defensive First Team (2024)
Sophie Cunningham Key Contributor (1.05) 27.7 Medium (1.1) 8.4 3.9 2.0 1.3 36.27 Filled an important complementary role by spacing the floor, moving without the ball and embracing physical wing defense. Season reporting frequently mentioned that her competitiveness and toughness supplied valuable balance alongside Phoenix’s high-usage stars.  
Rebecca Allen Key Contributor (1.05) 24.8 Low (1.0) 7.4 3.9 1.1 1.6 29.40 Brought defensive versatility and perimeter shooting after joining the rotation, often guarding multiple positions in the same game. Independent coverage highlighted her length and positional flexibility as a strong fit in Phoenix’s switching schemes.  
Natasha Mack Key Contributor (1.05) 15.5 Low (1.0) 3.8 5.0 1.1 1.9 24.78 Made her biggest impact through rim protection, offensive rebounding and energetic interior defense rather than scoring. Writers covering the Mercury routinely pointed to her activity level whenever the second unit needed a defensive lift.  
Monique Billings Bench (1.0) 18.0 Low (1.0) 4.9 4.2 0.5 1.4 22.00 Supplied frontcourt energy with active rebounding and defensive hustle after joining the club. Independent reporting consistently described her as a reliable effort player capable of changing the game’s physical tone.  
Sug Sutton Bench (1.0) 14.9 Low (1.0) 2.9 1.1 2.4 0.6 14.00 Served as reserve point guard depth, focusing on ball movement and defensive pressure instead of scoring. Coverage around the team noted her composure in maintaining offensive flow when called into the rotation.  
Celeste Taylor Bench (1.0) 20.1 Low (1.0) 3.5 1.8 1.8 1.6 17.40 Earned opportunities because of her defensive intensity and willingness to pressure opposing guards. Independent reports suggested the coaching staff valued her point-of-attack defense more than her offensive production.  
Mikiah Herbert Harrigan Bench (1.0) 10.8 Low (1.0) 3.2 1.5 0.3 0.9 11.80 Filled a reserve stretch-forward role, offering floor spacing and defensive length in short bursts. Contemporary independent coverage remained limited but generally emphasized her versatility off the bench.  
Amy Atwell Bench (1.0) 9.8 Low (1.0) 2.5 1.0 1.0 0.2 9.40 Worked primarily as perimeter depth with an emphasis on spot-up shooting. Independent season-specific reporting was limited because of her brief appearances.  
Morgan Bertsch Bench (1.0) 9.8 Low (1.0) 2.6 1.5 0.3 0.1 9.00 Provided occasional frontcourt minutes as a floor-spacing option. Contemporary independent coverage was limited due to her small offensive role.  
Liz Dixon Bench (1.0) 9.4 Low (1.0) 1.8 2.4 0.5 0.6 10.60 Contributed as an energetic reserve who focused on rebounding and interior effort. Independent reporting on her season was limited because of inconsistent playing time.  
Charisma Osborne Bench (1.0) 5.0 Low (1.0) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 4.00 Appeared briefly in a developmental role. Contemporary independent coverage specific to her Mercury stint was limited because of the very small sample.  
Phoenix Mercury Totals       107.1 41.2 31.9 15.0      

HeatingUp Impact Index: Playoff Team Impact Spotlight

Player Name Role Tier MPG Usage Tier PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) Impact Index Notes Awards
Natasha Cloud Starter/Star (1.1) 36.5 High (1.2) 24.5 5.5 10.0 1.5 109.56 Controlled virtually every half-court possession, dictating tempo while aggressively hunting her own offense when defenses sagged. Independent playoff coverage consistently praised her command as both primary creator and emotional leader, with Phoenix relying on her to generate quality looks under constant defensive pressure.  
Brittney Griner Starter/Star (1.1) 29.5 High (1.2) 17.0 5.5 0.0 2.5 66.00 Served as the interior anchor on both ends, forcing help defenders into the paint while protecting the rim. Game analysis regularly highlighted how opponents adjusted their schemes around her size even when the box score didn’t capture her full defensive influence.  
Kahleah Copper Starter/Star (1.1) 29.5 High (1.2) 14.5 4.5 2.5 1.0 59.40 Attacked downhill from the opening tip, looking to create transition chances and pressure the rim instead of settling. Postgame reporting noted that Phoenix leaned heavily on her ability to manufacture offense whenever possessions stalled.  
Diana Taurasi Starter/Star (1.1) 29.5 High (1.2) 15.5 3.0 2.5 1.0 58.08 Worked as the veteran organizer, spacing the floor and making quick decisions against aggressive defensive coverages. Independent writers frequently pointed to her composure and leadership despite the difficult playoff matchup.  
Sophie Cunningham Key Contributor (1.05) 31.5 Medium (1.1) 6.5 4.5 3.5 2.0 38.12 Filled a glue-player role by defending physically, moving the ball and knocking down timely perimeter shots. Coverage from the series consistently praised her competitiveness and willingness to handle difficult wing assignments.  
Natasha Mack Bench (1.0) 13.0 Low (1.0) 7.0 3.5 0.5 0.5 23.00 Supplied energetic frontcourt minutes, making an impact through offensive rebounding and interior defense rather than volume scoring. Independent playoff observations highlighted the spark she provided off the bench.  
Monique Billings Bench (1.0) 14.0 Low (1.0) 4.0 3.5 0.5 0.5 17.00 Brought physicality and hustle to the second unit, battling on the glass and defending multiple frontcourt matchups. Contemporary coverage emphasized her effort whenever Phoenix needed extra energy.  
Celeste Taylor Bench (1.0) 14.0 Low (1.0) 2.5 1.0 2.5 0.5 13.00 Entered primarily for defensive pressure on the perimeter and played within her role offensively. Independent reporting noted the coaching staff’s trust in her point-of-attack defense during limited playoff minutes.  
Mikiah Herbert Harrigan Bench (1.0) 1.5 Low (1.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Appeared only briefly, leaving too small a sample for meaningful on-court evaluation. Contemporary independent playoff coverage was limited because of her minimal playing time.  
Amy Atwell Bench (1.0) 1.0 Low (1.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Saw only a brief appearance, with no substantial opportunity to establish a role. Independent playoff coverage specific to her minutes was limited.  
Phoenix Mercury Totals       91.5 28.5 19.5 9.5