Last Updated on September 1, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

Phoenix Mercury 2010 featured one of the WNBA’s most explosive offenses, built around Diana Taurasi’s elite scoring and playmaking, with Candice Dupree providing highly efficient interior production and rebounding. Penny Taylor added versatile scoring and primary ball-handling, while Tangela Smith stretched the floor from the frontcourt. The Mercury played at a fast pace and scored efficiently, but their defensive numbers lagged behind, making high-scoring games a defining characteristic of the season.

Roster

NO. PLAYER POS. HT. WT. DOB COLLEGE
2 Temeka Johnson G 5-3 142 September 6, 1982 LSU
3 Diana Taurasi G 6-0 163 June 11, 1982 UConn
4 Candice Dupree F 6-2 178 August 16, 1984 Temple
11 Ketia Swanier G 5-7 150 August 10, 1986 UConn
13 Penny Taylor F 6-1 165 May 24, 1981
17 Sequoia Holmes G 6-1 155 June 13, 1986 UNLV
21 Brooke Smith F-C 6-3 188 April 30, 1984 Stanford
23 Taylor Lilley G 5-6 130 February 29, 1988 Oregon
24 DeWanna Bonner F-G 6-4 140 August 21, 1987 Auburn
30 Nicole Ohlde F-C 6-5 189 March 13, 1982 Kansas State
45 Kara Braxton C-F 6-6 225 February 18, 1983 Georgia
50 Tangela Smith C 6-3 158 April 1, 1977 Iowa

Regular Season Per Game

PLAYER NAME POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Diana Taurasi 28 31 31 32.2 22.6 4.3 4.7 1.2 0.6 3.5 16.0 6.8 .427 6.9 2.6 .374 7.0 6.4 .912
Candice Dupree 25 34 34 29.8 15.7 7.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 1.9 10.2 6.8 .664 0.0 0.0 .000 2.3 2.1 .936
Penny Taylor 29 32 32 30.0 15.9 4.4 5.0 1.5 0.3 2.4 10.6 5.4 .509 3.3 1.4 .442 4.1 3.7 .893
DeWanna Bonner 22 32 4 25.4 12.0 6.1 1.3 0.7 1.2 1.3 8.9 4.1 .465 1.7 0.6 .358 3.7 3.1 .840
Kara Braxton 27 13 0 17.2 11.1 4.8 1.2 0.6 0.4 2.1 7.9 4.3 .544 0.0 0.0   3.5 2.5 .711
Tangela Smith 33 34 34 29.2 9.2 5.2 0.9 0.7 0.9 1.1 8.8 3.5 .395 4.3 1.5 .347 1.1 0.8 .750
Temeka Johnson 27 34 34 27.3 9.2 3.2 4.7 0.9 0.2 2.0 8.7 3.6 .411 2.9 0.9 .309 1.4 1.1 .796
Ketia Swanier 23 32 0 10.1 3.0 1.2 1.7 0.3 0.0 1.3 2.9 1.1 .391 1.0 0.4 .387 0.7 0.3 .524
Taylor Lilley 22 21 1 10.8 3.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.8 2.8 1.1 .397 2.0 0.7 .326 0.5 0.5 .909
Nicole Ohlde 28 20 0 11.1 3.0 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.8 2.6 1.2 .442 0.0 0.0   1.2 0.7 .609
Brooke Smith 26 16 0 8.2 2.5 1.8 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 1.4 1.1 .739 0.0 0.0   0.4 0.4 .857
Sequoia Holmes 24 15 0 7.9 1.8 1.3 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.7 2.6 0.5 .205 0.7 0.0 .000 1.0 0.7 .733

Playoff Per Game

PLAYER NAME POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Candice Dupree 25 4 4 32.3 20.8 8.3 1.3 1.5 0.8 0.5 13.5 8.5 .630 0.0 0.0   4.0 3.8 .938
Diana Taurasi 28 4 4 31.3 18.5 5.3 3.8 1.8 0.8 4.0 13.8 6.5 .473 6.0 3.3 .542 2.8 2.3 .818
Penny Taylor 29 4 4 31.8 14.0 4.8 6.8 2.0 0.5 2.3 9.5 4.5 .474 2.3 1.3 .556 4.3 3.8 .882
Temeka Johnson 27 4 4 30.3 9.5 3.8 8.3 1.0 0.0 2.0 11.3 4.0 .356 3.0 1.0 .333 0.5 0.5 1.000
Tangela Smith 33 4 4 32.3 9.3 6.5 2.3 0.5 1.3 1.3 7.3 3.5 .483 4.3 1.5 .353 1.0 0.8 .750
Kara Braxton 27 4 0 13.3 9.0 2.5 0.8 0.3 0.3 1.8 6.8 4.0 .593 0.3 0.3 1.000 1.8 0.8 .429
DeWanna Bonner 22 4 0 22.8 7.5 3.3 0.5 0.8 1.8 0.8 6.0 2.8 .458 1.0 0.8 .750 1.5 1.3 .833
Taylor Lilley 22 2 0 3.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.5 .333 0.5 0.0 .000 0.0 0.0  
Brooke Smith 26 2 0 4.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 .500 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  
Ketia Swanier 23 2 0 4.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.5 .333 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  
Sequoia Holmes 24 1 0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  

HeatingUp Impact Index: Regular Season Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Diana Taurasi Starter/Star (1.1) 32.2 High (1.2) 22.6 4.3 4.7 1.8 87.65 Phoenix again relied on Taurasi to dictate every half-court possession, but opposing defenses were more willing to crowd her after the title run. Independent coverage still praised her ability to manufacture offense late in games despite constant defensive attention. WNBA All-Star (2010); All-WNBA First Team (2010)
Penny Taylor Starter/Star (1.1) 30.0 High (1.2) 15.9 4.4 5.0 1.8 71.28 Taylor became the Mercury’s secondary playmaker, often initiating offense to relieve pressure from Taurasi. Writers frequently pointed to her versatility, noting she could seamlessly shift between facilitating, defending wings and scoring when needed. WNBA All-Star (2010)
Candice Dupree Starter/Star (1.1) 29.8 High (1.2) 15.7 7.6 1.3 1.8 69.17 Dupree immediately transformed Phoenix’s interior attack with remarkably efficient finishing around the rim. Season coverage regularly highlighted how her reliable post scoring gave the Mercury a dimension they had previously lacked. WNBA All-Star (2010)
DeWanna Bonner Key Contributor (1.05) 25.4 Medium (1.1) 12.0 6.1 1.3 1.9 49.20 Bonner expanded beyond an energy role, using her length to rebound, defend multiple positions and attack in transition. Analysts viewed her growing versatility as one of Phoenix’s biggest positives despite the team’s uneven season.  
Tangela Smith Starter/Star (1.1) 29.2 Medium (1.1) 9.2 5.2 0.9 1.6 40.56 Smith continued spacing the floor from the frontcourt while handling difficult defensive assignments. Her willingness to pull opposing centers away from the basket remained an important part of Phoenix’s offensive identity.  
Temeka Johnson Starter/Star (1.1) 27.3 Medium (1.1) 9.2 3.2 4.7 1.1 43.08 Johnson’s value came from organization rather than volume scoring. Coaches trusted her to keep Phoenix’s pace high while making quick reads that allowed the team’s scorers to operate with space.  
Kara Braxton Key Contributor (1.05) 17.2 Medium (1.1) 11.1 4.8 1.2 1.0 41.12 Braxton supplied physical interior scoring and size off the bench after joining the club midseason. Independent reporting emphasized how her low-post presence balanced a roster built primarily around perimeter play.  
Nicole Ohlde Bench (1.0) 11.1 Low (1.0) 3.0 1.9 0.5 0.6 12.00 Ohlde filled a reserve frontcourt role and gave Phoenix experienced depth when extra size was required. Independent season coverage of her individual play was limited because of her situational minutes.  
Ketia Swanier Bench (1.0) 10.1 Low (1.0) 3.0 1.2 1.7 0.3 12.40 Swanier remained an aggressive backup point guard whose defensive pressure occasionally sparked Phoenix’s transition game. Her breakout scoring night against Tulsa demonstrated the confidence coaches had in her when opportunities arose. (WNBA)  
Taylor Lilley Bench (1.0) 10.8 Low (1.0) 3.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 10.80 Lilley was used primarily as a floor-spacing rookie shooter. Contemporary independent coverage was limited, with most discussion focusing on her outside shooting and developmental potential.  
Brooke Smith Bench (1.0) 8.2 Low (1.0) 2.5 1.8 0.3 0.4 10.00 Smith provided dependable frontcourt depth whenever Phoenix needed additional rebounding. Independent reporting on her season was limited due to her small role in the regular rotation.  
Sequoia Holmes Bench (1.0) 7.9 Low (1.0) 1.8 1.3 0.4 0.4 7.80 Holmes appeared in limited reserve minutes on the wing. Contemporary independent coverage was sparse, with most references centering on roster depth rather than a consistent rotation role.  
TEAM TOTALS   238.2   106.3 41.9 23.9 14.9      

HeatingUp Impact Index: Playoff Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Diana Taurasi Starter/Star (1.1) 31.3 High (1.2) 18.5 5.3 3.8 2.6 79.99 Taurasi remained Phoenix’s primary offensive creator, but Seattle’s disciplined defense forced her into tougher looks throughout the series. Even after difficult shooting stretches, she continued drawing defensive attention that created opportunities for teammates. (WNBA) WNBA All-Star (2010); All-WNBA First Team (2010)
Penny Taylor Starter/Star (1.1) 31.8 High (1.2) 14.0 4.8 6.8 2.5 74.45 Taylor did much of the connective work, handling secondary playmaking while defending multiple positions. Her all-around approach was one of the few constants as Phoenix tried to counter Seattle’s physical half-court defense. (WNBA) WNBA All-Star (2010)
Candice Dupree Starter/Star (1.1) 32.3 High (1.2) 20.8 8.3 1.3 2.3 85.01 Dupree consistently gave Phoenix efficient interior scoring, finishing through contact and punishing single coverage. Even in the series loss, independent game coverage highlighted her reliability around the basket when perimeter shots stopped falling. (WNBA) WNBA All-Star (2010)
Temeka Johnson Starter/Star (1.1) 30.3 Medium (1.1) 9.5 3.8 8.3 1.0 54.72 Johnson’s responsibility shifted toward creating quality looks against Seattle’s pressure. Her passing kept Phoenix organized, although the Storm’s defensive rotations limited many of the transition opportunities the Mercury usually thrived on. (WNBA)  
Tangela Smith Starter/Star (1.1) 32.3 Medium (1.1) 9.3 6.5 2.3 1.8 48.64 Smith stretched Seattle’s frontcourt with her perimeter shooting while still battling on the glass. Her spacing remained valuable, but the Storm largely prevented Phoenix from turning that spacing into its usual high-tempo attack.  
DeWanna Bonner Key Contributor (1.05) 22.8 Medium (1.1) 7.5 3.3 0.5 2.6 32.34 Bonner supplied energy off the bench, using her length to contest shots and finish in transition whenever chances appeared. Her defensive activity remained noticeable despite Phoenix’s shortened postseason run.  
Kara Braxton Key Contributor (1.05) 13.3 Medium (1.1) 9.0 2.5 0.8 0.6 29.57 Braxton brought needed physicality inside and gave Phoenix another low-post option against Seattle’s size. Her minutes were targeted toward adding toughness around the basket rather than fitting the Mercury’s usual up-tempo style.  
Brooke Smith Bench (1.0) 4.5 Low (1.0) 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.00 Smith appeared only briefly as reserve frontcourt depth. Independent playoff coverage of her role was limited because Phoenix relied heavily on its veteran rotation.  
Taylor Lilley Bench (1.0) 3.0 Low (1.0) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 4.00 Lilley’s postseason opportunities were limited as Phoenix shortened its bench. Contemporary reporting offered little individual analysis beyond her role as an available perimeter shooter.  
Ketia Swanier Bench (1.0) 4.5 Low (1.0) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 Swanier saw only brief backup point guard minutes during the series. Independent coverage was limited, reflecting Phoenix’s reliance on its experienced backcourt.  
Sequoia Holmes Bench (1.0) 1.0 Low (1.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Holmes made only a cameo appearance during the playoffs. Contemporary independent reporting on her postseason contribution was unavailable because she did not factor into the regular rotation.  
TEAM TOTALS   207.1   90.6 35.0 27.3 13.8