Last Updated on September 2, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

The 2004 Detroit Shock were led by Swin Cash, whose versatile scoring, rebounding, and defense made her the centerpiece of a balanced lineup. Deanna Nolan supplied perimeter scoring and playmaking, while Cheryl Ford established herself as an elite rebounder and interior presence. Detroit’s success was built on physical defense, dominant rebounding, balanced offensive contributions, and disciplined ball movement, with multiple players making meaningful impacts on both ends of the floor.

Roster

NO. PLAYER NAME POS HT WT BIRTH DATE COLLEGE
0 Ruth Riley C 6-5 198 August 28, 1979 Notre Dame
2 Chandi Jones G 5-9 150 March 25, 1982 Houston
3 Isabel Sanchez G 5-10 152 November 28, 1976  
5 Elaine Powell G 5-8 150 August 9, 1975 LSU
6 Jae Kingi-Cross G 5-8 150 January 20, 1976  
9 Stacey Thomas F 5-10 154 August 29, 1978 Michigan
12 Ayana Walker F 6-3 143 September 10, 1979 Louisiana Tech
14 Deanna Nolan G-F 5-9 147 August 25, 1979 Georgia
21 Amisha Carter F 6-2 179 June 21, 1982 Louisiana Tech
25 Merlakia Jones G 5-10 147 June 21, 1973 Florida
32 Swin Cash F 6-1 171 September 22, 1979 UConn
33 Iciss Tillis F-C 6-5 165 December 6, 1981 Duke
35 Cheryl Ford F 6-3 195 June 6, 1981 Louisiana Tech
41 Stacy Stephens C 6-1 205 January 21, 1982 Texas
54 Barbara Farris F-C 6-3 200 September 10, 1976 Tulane

Per Game

PLAYER NAME POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Swin Cash 24 32 32 34.5 16.4 6.5 4.2 1.4 0.9 2.5 12.0 5.6 .469 0.7 0.3 .348 6.8 4.9 .721
Deanna Nolan 24 34 34 33.5 13.6 3.9 3.3 1.9 0.4 2.6 12.8 4.9 .382 3.4 1.0 .289 3.6 2.9 .798
Ruth Riley 24 34 34 30.5 11.1 5.9 1.5 0.9 1.6 2.4 10.1 4.5 .446 0.1 0.0 .500 2.6 2.1 .816
Cheryl Ford 23 31 31 29.4 10.6 9.6 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.7 9.3 3.8 .411 0.0 0.0   5.1 3.0 .589
Merlakia Jones 31 33 2 15.7 5.5 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.8 6.2 2.3 .371 0.5 0.1 .267 1.0 0.7 .750
Elaine Powell 28 30 26 25.3 4.4 2.8 4.5 1.2 0.3 2.0 4.6 1.7 .377 0.0 0.0   1.7 1.0 .580
Barbara Farris 27 26 0 16.2 4.5 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.0 3.1 1.6 .513 0.0 0.0   2.1 1.4 .667
Chandi Jones 22 31 8 12.8 3.5 1.1 1.5 0.6 0.2 1.3 3.3 1.2 .359 1.0 0.3 .250 1.0 0.8 .806
Iciss Tillis 22 31 1 9.3 2.7 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 2.4 1.1 .473 0.6 0.2 .333 0.4 0.2 .583
Isabel Sanchez 27 10 0 6.2 2.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.1 1.4 0.6 .429 0.5 0.2 .400 1.1 0.8 .727
Ayana Walker 24 18 1 8.2 1.0 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.6 0.4 .286 0.0 0.0   0.3 0.1 .333
Stacy Stephens 22 7 1 5.1 0.6 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.3 .333 0.0 0.0   0.3 0.0 .000
Jae Kingi-Cross 28 5 0 3.0 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0   0.8 0.6 .750
Amisha Carter 22 2 0 6.5 0.5 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0   1.0 0.5 .500
Stacey Thomas 25 1 0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  

HeatingUp Impact Index: Regular Season Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Swin Cash Starter/Star 34.5 High 16.4 6.5 4.2 2.3 77.88 Cash remained Detroit’s offensive hub, operating as a point-forward who initiated transition and defended multiple positions. National coverage regularly described her as redefining the small forward role with her blend of size, playmaking and versatility, even as the defending champions struggled to find consistency. All-WNBA Second Team (2004); WNBA All-Star (2004); Olympic Gold Medal (2004)
Deanna Nolan Starter/Star 33.5 High 13.6 3.9 3.3 2.3 60.19 Nolan’s aggressive two-way style became even more central to Bill Laimbeer’s system. Associated Press coverage highlighted her ability to lock down opposing scorers while still creating offense, making her one of Detroit’s most complete perimeter players. WNBA All-Star (2004); Olympic Gold Medal (2004)
Cheryl Ford Starter/Star 29.4 High 10.6 9.6 1.1 2.1 61.78 Detroit continued to lean on Ford’s relentless work around the basket, where her rebounding often carried the frontcourt through difficult stretches. Retrospective features credited her with setting the team’s physical identity and consistently winning possession battles. WNBA All-Star (2004)
Ruth Riley Starter/Star 30.5 Medium 11.1 5.9 1.5 2.5 50.82 Riley anchored the defense as the primary rim protector, sacrificing touches to organize the back line and contest everything near the basket. Even during an uneven title defense, she remained the calming presence inside that teammates relied upon. Olympic Bronze Medal (2004)
Elaine Powell Starter/Star 25.3 Medium 4.4 2.8 4.5 1.5 32.44 Powell’s value came through pace control rather than volume scoring. She handled the toughest backcourt assignments, kept Detroit organized offensively and allowed Cash and Nolan to attack without carrying full-time playmaking duties. None
Merlakia Jones Key Contributor 15.7 Low 5.5 2.1 0.6 0.7 18.67 Jones accepted a reserve role after years as a starter, bringing veteran toughness and timely scoring. Independent reporting frequently noted her willingness to stabilize second units despite reduced minutes. None
Barbara Farris Bench 16.2 Low 4.5 2.3 0.3 0.4 15.00 Farris supplied dependable frontcourt depth with physical interior defense and efficient finishing around the rim. Contemporary player-specific coverage was limited, reflecting her supporting role in Detroit’s rotation. None
Chandi Jones Key Contributor 12.8 Low 3.5 1.1 1.5 0.8 14.49 Jones filled an energy role off the bench, spacing the floor while providing secondary ball handling. Detroit valued her willingness to defend multiple perimeter positions despite inconsistent offensive opportunities. None
Iciss Tillis Bench 9.3 Low 2.7 1.3 0.4 0.6 10.00 Tillis offered frontcourt versatility with occasional perimeter range, giving Laimbeer another rotational option when matchups required mobility. Independent season-specific reporting on her role remained limited. None
Isabel Sanchez Bench 6.2 Low 2.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 6.40 Sanchez saw limited opportunities as a reserve guard after joining the roster during the season. Contemporary independent coverage of her individual contributions was sparse. None
Ayana Walker Bench 8.2 Low 1.0 1.4 0.3 0.3 6.00 Walker provided situational rebounding and defensive minutes when Detroit needed additional frontcourt size. Independent reporting focused primarily on the club’s established core rather than her limited appearances. None
Amisha Carter Bench 6.5 Low 0.5 2.0 0.0 1.0 7.00 Carter appeared only briefly but flashed defensive activity around the basket. Contemporary independent coverage of her season was extremely limited because of her minimal playing time. None
Stacy Stephens Bench 5.1 Low 0.6 1.3 0.4 0.0 4.60 Stephens spent most of the season outside the regular rotation, seeing only occasional frontcourt minutes. Little independent reporting discussed her individual role. None
Jae Kingi-Cross Bench 3.0 Low 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 2.00 Kingi-Cross was used sparingly as backcourt depth, making only a handful of appearances. Independent season-specific coverage was limited. None
Stacey Thomas Bench 1.0 Low 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Thomas made a lone appearance during Detroit’s championship defense. No meaningful independent reporting was available on her individual season due to her limited action. None
DETROIT SHOCK TOTALS 76.6 41.9 20.3 14.7 367.27 Detroit followed its championship season with a 17-17 record before falling to New York in the first round. The roster remained one of the league’s toughest defensive groups, but offensive inconsistency prevented a deeper playoff run. None

HeatingUp Impact Index: Playoff Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Deanna Nolan Starter/Star 39.7 High 18.0 4.7 2.3 1.7 70.75 Detroit leaned on Nolan as its primary offensive creator throughout the series, giving her freedom to attack off the dribble and create late-clock shots. Even in defeat, independent playoff coverage consistently pointed to her aggressive scoring as the Shock’s biggest offensive threat. (Basketball Reference) None
Cheryl Ford Starter/Star 37.0 High 16.0 10.7 0.3 3.6 80.78 Ford controlled the paint with relentless rebounding and physical interior defense, repeatedly creating second chances while battling New York’s frontcourt. Her effort level remained one of the few constants during Detroit’s short postseason run. None
Ruth Riley Starter/Star 31.7 Medium 9.7 5.0 3.0 2.7 49.20 Riley served as the defensive organizer, protecting the rim while facilitating from the high post when Detroit struggled to generate half-court offense. Her all-around responsibilities extended well beyond her scoring numbers. None
Elaine Powell Starter/Star 32.3 Medium 7.7 2.0 7.0 3.3 48.40 Powell’s role centered on controlling tempo and initiating nearly every half-court possession. Her seven assists per game reflected the coaching staff’s trust in her decision-making despite the early playoff exit. None
Merlakia Jones Key Contributor 20.3 Low 7.7 4.0 0.7 1.3 28.14 Jones provided experienced scoring off the bench, attacking mid-range openings and supplying steady defensive minutes. Contemporary reporting regularly viewed her veteran presence as valuable during tense postseason games. None
Barbara Farris Key Contributor 26.0 Low 6.0 5.0 0.7 0.3 25.20 Farris gave Detroit dependable frontcourt depth, contributing hustle plays, offensive rebounds and physical defense whenever the starters rested. Individual playoff coverage was limited, but her rotational role remained important. None
Iciss Tillis Bench 6.0 Low 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 2.60 Tillis appeared briefly as a reserve forward in a shortened playoff rotation. Independent player-specific reporting from the series was limited because of her minimal role. None
Chandi Jones Bench 5.0 Low 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.00 Jones saw only spot minutes on the perimeter as Detroit relied heavily on its veteran guards. Contemporary independent coverage of her individual series was limited. None
Stacey Thomas Bench 2.3 Low 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 3.20 Thomas made only brief appearances, providing emergency frontcourt depth. Little independent reporting focused on her postseason contributions due to the limited workload. None
Ayana Walker Bench 2.0 Low 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.00 Walker’s playoff action was limited to short relief minutes. Independent coverage discussing her individual impact during the series was unavailable beyond general rotation notes. None
DETROIT SHOCK PLAYOFF TOTALS 66.8 29.2 20.8 13.2 311.07 Detroit’s title defense ended in a hard-fought three-game first-round loss to New York. The Shock remained an elite rebounding and defensive team, but inconsistent half-court offense ultimately prevented another deep postseason run. None