Last Updated on September 2, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

The Charlotte Sting 2005 were led by Tammy Sutton-Brown, whose interior scoring, rebounding, and shot-blocking anchored the frontcourt, while Dawn Staley remained the team’s primary playmaker and floor leader. Nicole Powell added versatile scoring and rebounding from the wing, with Allison Feaster providing additional perimeter offense. The Sting relied on strong interior play and balanced contributions across the lineup, though inconsistent outside shooting limited their offensive efficiency.

Roster

NO. PLAYER POS HT WT DOB COLLEGE
2 Sheri Sam G-F 6-0 160 May 5, 1974 Vanderbilt
4 Janel McCarville F-C 6-2 225 November 3, 1982 Minnesota
5 Dawn Staley G 5-6 134 May 4, 1970 Virginia
12 Ayana Walker F 6-3 143 September 10, 1979 Louisiana Tech
13 Kelly Mazzante G 6-0 155 February 2, 1982 Penn State
15 Jia Perkins G 5-8 165 February 23, 1982 Texas Tech
20 Tynesha Lewis G 5-10 152 May 8, 1979 NC State
21 Allison Feaster F 5-11 168 February 11, 1976 Harvard University
24 Adrienne Goodson F 6-0 165 October 19, 1966 Old Dominion
24 Jessica Moore F-C 6-3 175 July 9, 1982 UConn
30 Helen Darling G 5-6 164 August 29, 1978 Penn State
31 Teana Miller C 6-3 220 October 5, 1980 Tulane
50 Tangela Smith C 6-3 158 April 1, 1977 Iowa
52 Kristen Rasmussen F 6-4 172 November 1, 1978 Michigan State
55 Tammy Sutton-Brown C 6-4 199 January 27, 1978 Rutgers University
57 Caity Matter G 5-9 167 August 22, 1982 Ohio State

Per Game

PLAYER POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOPG FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Tangela Smith 28 31 31 34.3 13.6 5.2 1.3 1.6 1.0 2.7 13.1 5.5 .417 0.2 0.0 .000 3.4 2.7 .798
Sheri Sam 31 34 33 31.6 11.4 4.3 2.7 1.3 0.1 2.9 11.1 4.3 .387 1.6 0.5 .321 3.2 2.3 .713
Tammy Sutton-Brown 27 34 33 26.1 9.4 5.3 0.4 0.9 1.1 2.0 6.4 3.3 .509 0.0 0.0   4.1 2.8 .681
Allison Feaster 29 21 21 31.7 9.1 1.8 2.4 0.7 0.1 1.8 7.7 2.9 .377 4.1 1.8 .430 1.9 1.6 .846
Jia Perkins 23 30 11 15.5 5.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 0.3 1.1 5.0 2.1 .424 0.3 0.1 .333 1.0 0.6 .633
Dawn Staley 35 23 23 29.7 6.3 2.3 5.3 1.3 0.0 1.8 5.7 2.3 .405 1.8 0.7 .405 1.3 1.0 .767
Teana Miller 24 31 1 11.7 3.6 2.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.8 2.9 1.4 .484 0.0 0.0   1.2 0.8 .694
Helen Darling 26 31 11 19.4 3.5 1.5 2.7 1.3 0.0 1.6 2.8 0.9 .307 1.0 0.3 .313 1.9 1.4 .741
Adrienne Goodson 38 10 0 19.5 7.0 3.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 1.8 7.1 3.0 .423 0.1 0.1 1.000 1.5 0.9 .600
Kelly Mazzante 23 27 2 8.4 2.4 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 2.7 0.8 .292 1.7 0.5 .304 0.4 0.3 .800
Janel McCarville 22 28 3 11.1 1.8 2.7 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.8 1.8 0.6 .340 0.0 0.0   0.9 0.6 .640
Tynesha Lewis 26 10 1 16.6 4.7 2.0 1.3 0.3 0.3 1.1 6.1 1.9 .311 1.2 0.1 .083 1.6 0.8 .500
Ayana Walker 25 9 0 10.2 1.3 2.0 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.8 0.4 .250 0.0 0.0   0.9 0.4 .500
Caity Matter 22 10 0 5.6 0.9 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.3 0.3 .231 0.7 0.1 .143 0.2 0.2 1.000
Kristen Rasmussen 26 3 0 9.7 2.0 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.7 .500 1.0 0.7 .667 0.0 0.0  
Jessica Moore 22 6 0 8.2 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.2 .333 0.0 0.0   0.3 0.2 .500

HeatingUp Impact Index: Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Tangela Smith Starter/Star [1.10] 34.3 High [1.20] 13.6 5.2 1.3 2.6 59.14 Charlotte built much of its half-court offense around Smith’s face-up game and interior scoring, trusting her to absorb defensive attention while anchoring the frontcourt. Independent season coverage frequently identified her as the Sting’s most reliable two-way performer after arriving from Sacramento, with her versatility helping stabilize an injury-hit roster. (Basketball Reference) All-Star (2005)
Sheri Sam Starter/Star [1.10] 31.6 High [1.20] 11.4 4.3 2.7 1.4 52.01 Sam operated as Charlotte’s primary perimeter creator, often handling difficult shot-making assignments late in possessions. Game coverage consistently described her as an aggressive scorer capable of carrying stretches offensively even while the Sting struggled collectively. (Basketball Reference) None
Tammy Sutton-Brown Starter/Star [1.10] 26.1 High [1.20] 9.4 5.3 0.4 2.0 45.41 Sutton-Brown remained the defensive backbone of the frontcourt, protecting the rim and creating second chances with her rebounding. Analysts viewed her efficiency around the basket as one of the few constants during a difficult rebuilding season. (Basketball Reference) None
Allison Feaster Starter/Star [1.10] 31.7 Medium [1.10] 9.1 1.8 2.4 0.8 34.61 Before injuries shortened her season, Feaster filled the lead wing role by spacing the floor and defending opposing scorers. Independent reporting noted that Charlotte missed both her shot creation and defensive versatility once she was unavailable for extended stretches. None
Dawn Staley Starter/Star [1.10] 29.7 Medium [1.10] 6.3 2.3 5.3 1.3 36.30 Staley continued to organize the offense with patience rather than pace, serving as the team’s veteran decision-maker. Coverage throughout the season emphasized her leadership as Charlotte transitioned toward a younger core while she balanced playing duties with mentoring teammates. None
Helen Darling Key Contributor [1.05] 19.4 Medium [1.10] 3.5 1.5 2.7 1.3 20.79 Darling settled into a valuable rotation role as a defensive guard who could pressure opposing ball handlers and keep the offense organized. Her impact was measured more through tempo control than scoring volume. None
Adrienne Goodson Key Contributor [1.05] 19.5 Medium [1.10] 7.0 3.5 0.6 0.4 26.80 Returning as a veteran reserve, Goodson supplied physical frontcourt minutes and locker-room leadership. Contemporary reporting often highlighted the experience she brought to a roster that leaned increasingly on younger players. None
Jia Perkins Bench [1.00] 15.5 Low [1.00] 5.0 1.5 1.1 1.3 17.80 Perkins showed flashes as an attacking combo guard, bringing energy and defensive activity whenever she entered the rotation. Independent coverage suggested Charlotte viewed her athleticism as an important piece for the franchise’s future. None
Tynesha Lewis Bench [1.00] 16.6 Low [1.00] 4.7 2.0 1.3 0.6 17.20 Lewis provided reserve scoring but struggled to find offensive consistency as her minutes fluctuated. Contemporary coverage of her individual season was limited because injuries restricted her overall contribution. None
Teana Miller Bench [1.00] 11.7 Low [1.00] 3.6 2.1 0.2 1.1 14.00 Miller continued developing into a dependable interior reserve, supplying length and shot blocking off the bench. Most reporting focused on her gradual defensive progress rather than offensive production. None
Janel McCarville Bench [1.00] 11.1 Low [1.00] 1.8 2.7 0.4 0.7 11.20 McCarville spent much of her rookie campaign adjusting to the professional game, with Charlotte emphasizing her passing instincts and basketball IQ despite limited minutes. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2005)
Kelly Mazzante Bench [1.00] 8.4 Low [1.00] 2.4 1.1 0.3 0.3 8.20 Mazzante’s role centered on providing perimeter shooting in short bursts. Independent season-specific reporting was limited because she remained outside the regular offensive rotation. None
Ayana Walker Bench [1.00] 10.2 Low [1.00] 1.3 2.0 0.7 0.4 8.80 Walker was used primarily as a physical reserve forward capable of defending multiple frontcourt positions. Contemporary coverage of her season was limited due to her brief stint with the club. None
Kristen Rasmussen Bench [1.00] 9.7 Low [1.00] 2.0 1.7 0.7 0.3 9.40 Rasmussen appeared only sparingly, serving as emergency frontcourt depth. Limited independent reporting was available because she played only three games. None
Caity Matter Bench [1.00] 5.6 Low [1.00] 0.9 0.3 0.6 0.1 3.80 Matter spent most of her rookie year in a developmental role as Charlotte evaluated her perimeter shooting. Independent contemporary coverage was limited because she saw only spot minutes. None
Jessica Moore Bench [1.00] 8.2 Low [1.00] 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.0 3.20 Moore received only brief opportunities behind Charlotte’s veteran post rotation. Contemporary reporting on her individual season was limited because of her small workload. None
TOTALS   339.1   93.6 36.8 24.0 14.9 368.66   All-Star (2005): Tangela Smith; WNBA All-Rookie Team (2005): Janel McCarville