Last Updated on September 2, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

The Connecticut Sun 2015 were led by Alex Bentley’s backcourt scoring and playmaking, while Kelsey Bone and Chiney Ogwumike provided an effective interior presence with efficient scoring and strong rebounding. Jasmine Thomas added secondary ball handling and perimeter production, giving the team balanced offensive contributors. Connecticut rebounded well and generated offense from multiple sources, but inconsistent defense and shooting efficiency limited its ability to sustain success.

Roster

NO. PLAYER POS. HT. WT. DOB COLLEGE
1 Elizabeth Williams C-F 6-3 200 June 23, 1993 Duke
2 Camille Smith F 6-2 180 January 18, 1985 UNC
3 Kelsey Bone C 6-4 220 December 31, 1991 Texas A&M
6 Jasmine Thomas G 5-9 143 September 30, 1989 Duke
7 Kayla Pedersen F 6-4 190 April 14, 1989 Stanford
12 Chelsea Gray G 5-11 170 October 8, 1992 Duke
20 Alex Bentley G 5-7 152 October 27, 1990 Penn State
21 Jennifer Lacy F 6-3 175 March 21, 1983 Pepperdine
25 Alyssa Thomas F 6-2 203 April 12, 1992 Maryland
33 Inga Orekhova G 6-2 160 November 10, 1989 South Florida
34 Kelly Faris G 5-11 154 January 16, 1991 UConn
40 Shekinna Stricklen F 6-2 230 July 30, 1990 Tennessee
54 Nikki Greene F-C 6-4 192 September 6, 1990 Penn State

Per Game

PLAYER POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOPG FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Kelsey Bone 23 33 33 29.1 15.4 6.3 2.0 0.8 0.6 2.3 13.4 6.8 .508 0.1 0.0 .000 3.0 1.8 .622
Alex Bentley 24 25 25 30.0 14.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 1.2 13.9 5.7 .409 4.6 1.6 .336 2.1 1.8 .830
Camille Smith 30 34 34 27.0 8.2 3.6 1.6 1.2 0.2 1.7 7.7 3.1 .406 3.3 1.1 .345 1.0 0.9 .879
Jasmine Thomas 25 34 34 26.7 8.2 3.7 3.9 1.2 0.4 2.3 9.0 2.9 .328 3.1 0.9 .298 1.8 1.4 .783
Shekinna Stricklen 24 34 0 17.6 7.7 1.9 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.6 6.8 2.8 .411 4.2 1.5 .359 0.8 0.6 .786
Chelsea Gray 22 34 0 16.0 6.9 2.3 2.7 0.6 0.1 1.7 6.0 2.5 .424 1.9 0.7 .348 1.4 1.2 .816
Alyssa Thomas 23 24 23 26.0 8.8 5.3 1.4 1.2 0.2 1.8 7.0 2.9 .411 0.0 0.0   4.3 3.0 .692
Jennifer Lacy 32 19 11 16.7 7.0 2.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 5.2 2.3 .444 2.5 0.9 .354 1.9 1.5 .757
Kayla Pedersen 26 33 1 15.5 2.9 2.6 1.2 0.7 0.2 0.6 2.7 1.2 .433 0.0 0.0   0.7 0.6 .826
Kelly Faris 24 32 9 14.5 2.9 1.7 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.5 2.6 1.0 .381 0.9 0.3 .310 0.8 0.7 .778
Elizabeth Williams 22 21 0 11.7 3.3 3.2 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.5 2.5 1.3 .528 0.0 0.0   1.2 0.7 .560
Nikki Greene 24 12 0 8.4 1.2 2.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.3 .400 0.0 0.0   0.6 0.5 .857
Inga Orekhova 25 4 0 2.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 .000 0.5 0.0 .000 0.0 0.0  

HeatingUp Impact Index: Team Impact Spotlight

Player Name Role Tier MPG Usage Tier PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) Impact Index Notes Awards
Kelsey Bone Starter/Star 28.3 High 15.0 6.1 1.9 1.4 64.42 Operated as Connecticut’s primary interior scorer and low-post target, consistently creating deep paint position rather than stretching the floor. Independent season coverage frequently highlighted her improved conditioning and willingness to run the floor, making her one of the franchise’s key rebuilding pieces despite defensive inconsistency. None
Alex Bentley Starter/Star 30.0 High 14.7 2.0 2.0 2.2 55.18 Functioned as an aggressive scoring guard whose first instinct was attacking off the dribble. Reporters regularly noted that her confidence and shot creation gave the offense needed pace, even while she balanced lead-guard duties with occasional streaky shooting. None
Jasmine Thomas Starter/Star 26.7 Medium 8.2 3.7 3.9 1.6 42.11 Served as the team’s primary facilitator, organizing half-court possessions while taking the toughest backcourt defensive assignments. Contemporary reporting praised her competitiveness and willingness to pressure opposing guards despite offensive struggles. None
Alyssa Thomas Starter/Star 26.0 Medium 8.8 5.3 1.4 1.4 40.90 Played as a physical, versatile forward whose transition play and relentless motor stood out more than polished scoring. Analysts frequently viewed her as a long-term foundational piece because of her defensive versatility and toughness. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2015)
Camille Smith Starter/Star 27.0 Medium 8.2 3.6 1.6 1.4 35.82 Filled a dependable veteran wing role by spacing the floor and defending multiple perimeter positions. Coverage often described her as a stabilizing presence who accepted complementary responsibilities without needing high usage. None
Chelsea Gray Key Contributor 16.0 Medium 6.9 2.3 2.7 0.7 29.11 Worked as a second-unit playmaker, showing the vision and patience that scouts had admired before her injury. Although her minutes were managed, observers consistently pointed to her decision-making and passing feel as signs of future starting potential. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2015)
Shekinna Stricklen Key Contributor 17.6 Medium 7.7 1.9 0.6 0.8 25.41 Primarily provided perimeter spacing off the bench, giving lineups another reliable catch-and-shoot option. Independent analysis emphasized that her shooting gravity helped open driving lanes even when her box-score production remained modest. None
Jennifer Lacy Key Contributor 16.7 Low 7.0 2.4 0.4 0.9 22.47 Supplied experienced frontcourt depth with the ability to stretch defenses from mid-range and beyond. Coverage reflected the coaching staff’s trust in her veteran decision-making during reserve minutes. None
Elizabeth Williams Bench 11.7 Low 3.3 3.2 0.4 1.2 16.20 Limited contemporary coverage was available because of her reserve role, but independent reporting consistently identified her rim protection and defensive instincts as the skills most likely to earn a larger workload over time. None
Kayla Pedersen Bench 15.5 Low 2.9 2.6 1.2 0.9 15.20 Accepted a low-usage frontcourt role built around screening, rebounding and ball movement rather than scoring. Coaches leaned on her positional discipline and willingness to do the unnoticed work. None
Kelly Faris Bench 14.5 Low 2.9 1.7 1.0 0.5 12.20 Brought defensive energy and hustle in limited minutes, often drawing praise for effort plays that rarely appeared in traditional statistics. Her value came from versatility more than offensive production. None
Nikki Greene Bench 8.4 Low 1.2 2.0 0.2 0.7 8.20 Limited contemporary coverage was available, but independent reporting generally characterized her role as providing physical frontcourt depth and spot defensive minutes when needed. None
Inga Orekhova Bench 2.8 Low 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.20 Appeared only briefly during the season, leaving little independent reporting beyond observations that she was viewed as a developmental perimeter option still adjusting to the professional game. None
Totals 174.2 81.8 34.1 17.3 12.7 392.06 Team combined established veterans with a young rebuilding core, relying heavily on developing guards and interior scoring while gradually expanding the responsibilities of emerging long-term contributors.