Last Updated on July 16, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

Player Name Role Tier MPG Usage Tier PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) Impact Index Notes Awards
Kelsey Bone Starter/Star 28.3 High 15.0 6.1 1.9 1.4 64.42 Operated as Connecticut’s primary interior scorer and low-post target, consistently creating deep paint position rather than stretching the floor. Independent season coverage frequently highlighted her improved conditioning and willingness to run the floor, making her one of the franchise’s key rebuilding pieces despite defensive inconsistency. None
Alex Bentley Starter/Star 30.0 High 14.7 2.0 2.0 2.2 55.18 Functioned as an aggressive scoring guard whose first instinct was attacking off the dribble. Reporters regularly noted that her confidence and shot creation gave the offense needed pace, even while she balanced lead-guard duties with occasional streaky shooting. None
Jasmine Thomas Starter/Star 26.7 Medium 8.2 3.7 3.9 1.6 42.11 Served as the team’s primary facilitator, organizing half-court possessions while taking the toughest backcourt defensive assignments. Contemporary reporting praised her competitiveness and willingness to pressure opposing guards despite offensive struggles. None
Alyssa Thomas Starter/Star 26.0 Medium 8.8 5.3 1.4 1.4 40.90 Played as a physical, versatile forward whose transition play and relentless motor stood out more than polished scoring. Analysts frequently viewed her as a long-term foundational piece because of her defensive versatility and toughness. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2015)
Camille Smith Starter/Star 27.0 Medium 8.2 3.6 1.6 1.4 35.82 Filled a dependable veteran wing role by spacing the floor and defending multiple perimeter positions. Coverage often described her as a stabilizing presence who accepted complementary responsibilities without needing high usage. None
Chelsea Gray Key Contributor 16.0 Medium 6.9 2.3 2.7 0.7 29.11 Worked as a second-unit playmaker, showing the vision and patience that scouts had admired before her injury. Although her minutes were managed, observers consistently pointed to her decision-making and passing feel as signs of future starting potential. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2015)
Shekinna Stricklen Key Contributor 17.6 Medium 7.7 1.9 0.6 0.8 25.41 Primarily provided perimeter spacing off the bench, giving lineups another reliable catch-and-shoot option. Independent analysis emphasized that her shooting gravity helped open driving lanes even when her box-score production remained modest. None
Jennifer Lacy Key Contributor 16.7 Low 7.0 2.4 0.4 0.9 22.47 Supplied experienced frontcourt depth with the ability to stretch defenses from mid-range and beyond. Coverage reflected the coaching staff’s trust in her veteran decision-making during reserve minutes. None
Elizabeth Williams Bench 11.7 Low 3.3 3.2 0.4 1.2 16.20 Limited contemporary coverage was available because of her reserve role, but independent reporting consistently identified her rim protection and defensive instincts as the skills most likely to earn a larger workload over time. None
Kayla Pedersen Bench 15.5 Low 2.9 2.6 1.2 0.9 15.20 Accepted a low-usage frontcourt role built around screening, rebounding and ball movement rather than scoring. Coaches leaned on her positional discipline and willingness to do the unnoticed work. None
Kelly Faris Bench 14.5 Low 2.9 1.7 1.0 0.5 12.20 Brought defensive energy and hustle in limited minutes, often drawing praise for effort plays that rarely appeared in traditional statistics. Her value came from versatility more than offensive production. None
Nikki Greene Bench 8.4 Low 1.2 2.0 0.2 0.7 8.20 Limited contemporary coverage was available, but independent reporting generally characterized her role as providing physical frontcourt depth and spot defensive minutes when needed. None
Inga Orekhova Bench 2.8 Low 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.20 Appeared only briefly during the season, leaving little independent reporting beyond observations that she was viewed as a developmental perimeter option still adjusting to the professional game. None
Totals — 174.2 — 81.8 34.1 17.3 12.7 392.06 Team combined established veterans with a young rebuilding core, relying heavily on developing guards and interior scoring while gradually expanding the responsibilities of emerging long-term contributors. —