Last Updated on August 2, 2026 by Mat Diekhake
The Indiana Fever 2011 were led by Tamika Catchings, whose all-around production made her the team’s primary scorer, rebounder, playmaker, and defensive catalyst. Katie Douglas provided dependable perimeter scoring, while Briann January handled the lead playmaking role and Erlana Larkins added strong rebounding. The Fever emphasized disciplined defense, balanced offensive contributions, and efficient ball movement, relying on an experienced core to drive success throughout the season.
HeatingUp Impact Index: Regular Season Team Impact Spotlight
| Player Name | Role Tier | MPG | Usage Tier | PPG | RPG | APG | STK (SPG + BPG) | Impact Index | Notes | Awards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamika Catchings | Starter/Star (1.1) | 31.5 | High (1.2) | 15.5 | 7.1 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 76.6 | Two-way cornerstone for Indiana, Catchings continued to control games through defensive versatility, rebounding, and playmaking from the forward position. Her ability to create turnovers, guard multiple matchups, and initiate offense reflected the leadership role she held within the Fever system. | WNBA All-Star (2011); WNBA All-Defensive First Team (2011); All-WNBA First Team (2011) |
| Katie Douglas | Starter/Star (1.1) | 29.4 | High (1.2) | 13.9 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 63.9 | Douglas served as Indiana’s primary perimeter scorer and spacing threat, using movement shooting and veteran decision-making to keep defenses stretched. Her efficient three-point shooting and ability to defend wings made her a key piece of the Fever’s balanced attack. | WNBA All-Star (2011) |
| Briann January | Key Contributor (1.05) | 28.6 | Medium (1.1) | 8.6 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 38.1 | January took on a larger responsibility as a lead guard, providing ball pressure, transition speed, and improved playmaking. Indiana relied on her defensive instincts and ability to organize the offense despite her aggressive turnover tendencies. | — |
| Jessica Davenport | Key Contributor (1.05) | 21.1 | Medium (1.1) | 10.7 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 38.0 | Davenport gave Indiana reliable interior scoring and rim protection as a frontcourt contributor. Her efficient finishing and shot-blocking ability allowed the Fever to maintain size and physicality when rotating through the post. | — |
| Erin Phillips | Key Contributor (1.05) | 22.2 | Medium (1.1) | 8.6 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 34.2 | Phillips provided versatile guard play with the ability to handle, shoot, and defend multiple positions. Her toughness and energy fit Indiana’s defensive identity, while her perimeter shooting added another outlet alongside Catchings and Douglas. | WNBA Champion (2014) |
| Tangela Smith | Key Contributor (1.05) | 21.5 | Low (1.0) | 7.2 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 27.3 | Smith brought veteran frontcourt versatility, stretching defenses with outside shooting while competing against larger post players. Her experience gave Indiana another dependable option in different lineup combinations. | — |
| Tammy Sutton-Brown | Key Contributor (1.05) | 19.0 | Low (1.0) | 5.5 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 24.2 | Sutton-Brown remained an interior defender who affected games through positioning and shot blocking. Even with a reduced offensive role, her veteran presence helped Indiana protect the rim and manage physical matchups. | — |
| Shavonte Zellous | Bench (1.0) | 14.0 | Low (1.0) | 5.5 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 20.4 | Zellous supplied athletic scoring bursts from the wing, attacking gaps and providing energy in reserve minutes. Her development as a two-way perimeter option gave Indiana additional depth behind its veteran starters. | WNBA All-Rookie Team (2009) |
| Shannon Bobbitt | Bench (1.0) | 14.2 | Low (1.0) | 3.9 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 15.8 | Bobbitt operated as a quick reserve guard who pressured the ball and pushed tempo. Her role focused on changing pace and providing defensive intensity rather than carrying offensive usage. | — |
| Jeanette Pohlen-Mavunga | Bench (1.0) | 15.9 | Low (1.0) | 4.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 14.0 | Pohlen-Mavunga showed promise as a young perimeter shooter, spacing the floor while learning the demands of the professional game. Indiana used her as a developing guard option with a reliable shooting foundation. | — |
| Shyra Ely-Gash | Bench (1.0) | 10.8 | Low (1.0) | 3.1 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 12.0 | Ely-Gash provided reserve forward minutes built around effort, rebounding, and defensive activity. Her role was primarily to provide depth and physical play within Indiana’s rotation. | — |
| Indiana Fever Totals | — | — | — | 96.1 | 33.6 | 19.2 | 15.4 | — | Team statistical totals from listed players. Indiana’s 2011 regular season profile was driven by Catchings’ all-around impact, Douglas’ perimeter scoring, and a deep rotation built around defense and versatility. | — |
HeatingUp Impact Index: Playoff Team Impact Spotlight
| Player Name | Role Tier | MPG | Usage Tier | PPG | RPG | APG | STK (SPG + BPG) | Impact Index | Notes | Awards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Douglas | Starter/Star (1.1) | 33.5 | High (1.2) | 19.7 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 75.2 | Douglas became Indiana’s primary perimeter scoring option during the postseason, creating offense through movement shooting and aggressive shot-making. Her ability to space the floor while defending opposing wings gave the Fever a dependable veteran presence in high-pressure playoff possessions. | WNBA All-Star (2011) |
| Tamika Catchings | Starter/Star (1.1) | 31.7 | High (1.2) | 10.0 | 8.3 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 61.8 | Catchings impacted games beyond scoring, anchoring Indiana’s defense with rebounding, steals, and versatile coverage responsibilities. Even while dealing with inconsistent shooting, her leadership, defensive instincts, and ability to make winning plays remained central to the Fever’s postseason identity. | WNBA All-Star (2011); WNBA All-Defensive First Team (2011); All-WNBA First Team (2011) |
| Tammy Sutton-Brown | Starter/Star (1.1) | 28.7 | Medium (1.1) | 9.5 | 6.8 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 44.4 | Sutton-Brown provided Indiana with interior stability through rebounding and rim protection. Her playoff value came from controlling the paint, finishing efficiently, and using veteran positioning against opposing frontcourts. | — |
| Tangela Smith | Key Contributor (1.05) | 27.5 | Medium (1.1) | 9.5 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 37.3 | Smith offered a versatile frontcourt skill set, combining outside shooting with physical interior play. Indiana used her experience to create matchup problems and maintain offensive balance alongside Catchings and Douglas. | — |
| Shavonte Zellous | Key Contributor (1.05) | 19.2 | Medium (1.1) | 8.6 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 30.7 | Zellous gave the Fever athletic scoring from the wing, attacking gaps and providing energy against second units. Her increased playoff role reflected Indiana’s confidence in her ability to create offense without dominating possessions. | WNBA All-Rookie Team (2009) |
| Erin Phillips | Key Contributor (1.05) | 26.7 | Low (1.0) | 6.5 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 27.3 | Phillips handled important guard responsibilities as a secondary creator, bringing toughness and defensive activity. Her ability to pressure the ball and make connective plays helped Indiana maintain its structured half-court approach. | WNBA Champion (2014) |
| Jessica Davenport | Bench (1.0) | 16.5 | Low (1.0) | 7.7 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 24.4 | Davenport provided efficient interior scoring in limited playoff minutes, finishing around the basket and offering additional size. Her role was focused on frontcourt production and physicality when Indiana needed another post presence. | — |
| Shannon Bobbitt | Bench (1.0) | 11.5 | Low (1.0) | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 9.2 | Bobbitt served as a reserve point guard option, bringing quickness and ball pressure in short stretches. Her playoff minutes were primarily about tempo and defensive energy rather than scoring production. | — |
| Jeanette Pohlen-Mavunga | Bench (1.0) | 7.0 | Low (1.0) | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 7.2 | Pohlen-Mavunga saw limited postseason action but showed flashes of perimeter shooting ability. Indiana used her mostly as a developing young guard within a veteran-heavy rotation. | — |
| Shyra Ely-Gash | Bench (1.0) | 4.3 | Low (1.0) | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 7.2 | Ely-Gash played a small reserve role, contributing brief energy minutes on the wing. Her opportunities were limited as Indiana shortened its rotation during the playoffs. | — |
| Indiana Fever Totals | — | — | — | 86.5 | 35.9 | 16.3 | 13.1 | — | Team statistical totals from listed players. Indiana’s playoff formula centered on Douglas’ perimeter scoring, Catchings’ defensive versatility, and a veteran frontcourt rotation built around toughness and rebounding. | — |
