| Alyssa Thomas |
Starter/Star [1.10] |
32.4 |
High [1.20] |
10.6 |
8.4 |
7.9 |
2.1 |
76.03 |
Connecticut’s offense continued to flow through Thomas as a point-forward, with Stephanie White leaning on her playmaking from the elbows and in transition to organize nearly every half-court possession. Independent season coverage consistently highlighted her ability to dictate tempo, defend multiple positions and create advantages without needing to score heavily. (Swish Appeal) |
WNBA All-Star (2024); All-WNBA First Team (2024); WNBA All-Defensive First Team (2024); AP All-WNBA First Team (2024) |
| DeWanna Bonner |
Starter/Star [1.10] |
31.8 |
High [1.20] |
15.0 |
6.0 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
65.74 |
Bonner remained Connecticut’s primary wing scorer, frequently taking difficult late-clock assignments while also defending bigger forwards. Writers covering the Sun noted that her veteran shot-making and leadership stabilized the offense throughout the season, especially before Marina Mabrey’s arrival. (Swish Appeal) |
WNBA All-Star (2024) |
| DiJonai Carrington |
Starter/Star [1.10] |
29.6 |
Medium [1.10] |
12.7 |
5.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
51.94 |
Carrington embraced the role of Connecticut’s disruptive perimeter defender, routinely guarding elite backcourt scorers while attacking the rim with relentless energy. Analysts praised her physicality and competitive edge as key reasons behind her breakout campaign. (Swish Appeal) |
WNBA Most Improved Player (2024); WNBA All-Defensive First Team (2024) |
| Brionna Jones |
Starter/Star [1.10] |
27.2 |
Medium [1.10] |
13.7 |
5.5 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
50.82 |
Returning from injury, Jones quickly reclaimed her interior role by setting strong screens, finishing efficiently around the basket and anchoring the paint alongside Alyssa Thomas. Coverage regularly pointed to her physical presence as essential to Connecticut’s balanced frontcourt. (Swish Appeal) |
WNBA All-Star (2024) |
| Marina Mabrey |
Key Contributor [1.05] |
27.4 |
High [1.20] |
14.9 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
1.6 |
58.46 |
After arriving in a midseason trade, Mabrey immediately expanded Connecticut’s spacing with aggressive perimeter shooting and secondary playmaking. Independent reporting frequently described her as the offensive boost the Sun had lacked against elite opponents. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Tyasha Harris |
Starter/Star [1.10] |
28.8 |
Medium [1.10] |
10.5 |
1.8 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
40.29 |
Harris played a low-mistake lead guard role, balancing floor spacing with steady ball security while allowing Thomas to initiate much of the offense. Coaches and observers consistently valued her decision-making more than high-volume scoring. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Tiffany Mitchell |
Bench [1.00] |
16.3 |
Low [1.00] |
4.9 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
15.40 |
Mitchell filled a defensive reserve role on the wing, providing experienced perimeter coverage and situational scoring when called upon. Independent game coverage regularly highlighted her energy off the bench rather than offensive volume. (Reuters) |
None |
| Olivia Nelson-Ododa |
Bench [1.00] |
11.8 |
Low [1.00] |
3.4 |
2.5 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
14.20 |
Nelson-Ododa supplied rotational size behind Connecticut’s veteran frontcourt, with coaches primarily trusting her for rebounding, rim protection and maintaining defensive structure during reserve minutes. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Rachel Banham |
Bench [1.00] |
12.9 |
Low [1.00] |
4.8 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
14.60 |
Banham’s value centered on floor spacing, entering games to stretch defenses with quick perimeter shooting and experienced off-ball movement instead of creating offense off the dribble. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Veronica Burton |
Bench [1.00] |
12.7 |
Low [1.00] |
3.1 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
0.7 |
14.20 |
Burton handled backup point guard responsibilities with defensive pressure and ball movement, earning minutes because of her composure and willingness to facilitate rather than hunt shots. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Moriah Jefferson |
Bench [1.00] |
6.8 |
Low [1.00] |
2.1 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
7.40 |
Jefferson appeared only briefly during the regular season, leaving limited independent season-specific analysis beyond recognition of her veteran depth and leadership presence behind the guard rotation. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Astou Ndour-Fall |
Bench [1.00] |
4.2 |
Low [1.00] |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
4.20 |
Ndour-Fall served as emergency frontcourt depth, with limited contemporary coverage available beyond her ability to provide size and international experience when injuries or rotations required it. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Celeste Taylor |
Bench [1.00] |
5.5 |
Low [1.00] |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.00 |
Taylor’s regular-season sample was extremely small, and little independent reporting discussed her on-court role beyond developmental depth within Connecticut’s backcourt. (Swish Appeal) |
None |
| Queen Egbo |
Bench [1.00] |
2.3 |
Low [1.00] |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.80 |
Egbo made only brief appearances, leaving limited independent season coverage outside of roster-related reporting and reserve frontcourt depth discussions. (Connecticut Sun) |
None |
| Caitlin Bickle |
Bench [1.00] |
1.9 |
Low [1.00] |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
Bickle spent almost the entire season in a developmental reserve role, and meaningful independent game analysis was unavailable because of her limited court time. (Connecticut Sun) |
None |
| TEAM TOTALS |
— |
— |
— |
97.0 |
36.7 |
23.0 |
14.4 |
— |
Connecticut finished among the WNBA’s elite defensive teams, built around Alyssa Thomas’ playmaking, Bonner’s veteran scoring, Carrington’s perimeter defense and the midseason addition of Marina Mabrey, helping the Sun earn another deep postseason run despite questions about half-court shot creation against top contenders. (Swish Appeal) |
WNBA Semifinals (2024) |