Last Updated on July 16, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

Regular Season

Player Name Role Tier MPG Usage Tier PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) Impact Index Notes Awards
Tina Charles Starter/Star [1.1] 33.2 High [1.2] 18.0 10.5 1.7 1.9 84.74 The offense consistently flowed through Charles on the block, where opposing defenses routinely sent extra help. Independent coverage throughout the season highlighted her polished footwork, rebounding control and ability to anchor Mike Thibault’s half-court attack while handling the responsibility that comes with being the focal point of every scouting report. (CT Insider) WNBA All-Star (2011), All-WNBA First Team (2011)
Kara Lawson Starter/Star [1.1] 31.4 High [1.2] 15.1 3.9 4.0 0.9 63.10 Lawson operated as the veteran organizer, balancing perimeter shooting with steady decision-making. Season reporting regularly praised her leadership, spacing and late-game composure, qualities that helped stabilize a roster built around young interior talent. (CT Insider) WNBA All-Star (2011)
Asjha Jones Starter/Star [1.1] 27.9 Medium [1.1] 12.2 7.1 2.0 1.6 55.42 Jones filled the dependable frontcourt partner role, providing efficient scoring without demanding high volume. Writers frequently noted her defensive positioning, mid-range touch and willingness to handle difficult assignments that allowed Connecticut’s frontcourt to stay balanced. (CT Insider) WNBA Champion (2011)
Renee Montgomery Key Contributor [1.05] 24.0 High [1.2] 11.6 1.9 2.6 1.1 43.34 Used primarily as an attacking change-of-pace guard, Montgomery injected speed into the second unit and looked to pressure defenses off the dribble. Independent analysis often emphasized her ability to shift momentum despite streaky shooting efficiency. (Basketball Reference) None
Mistie Bass Key Contributor [1.05] 18.7 Medium [1.1] 8.0 4.5 1.0 1.2 33.96 Bass carved out value with physical interior play rather than featured scoring. Coverage from the season pointed to her screening, rebounding effort and reliable finishing around the basket as important depth behind the starting frontcourt. (Basketball Reference) None
Allison Hightower Starter/Star [1.1] 24.3 Medium [1.1] 6.8 2.3 2.5 1.4 31.46 Hightower was trusted to defend multiple perimeter positions even while her jumper fluctuated. Observers often viewed her defensive activity and willingness to take difficult wing assignments as more valuable than her scoring totals suggested. None
Kalana Greene Starter/Star [1.1] 17.8 Low [1.0] 4.2 1.9 1.7 1.3 20.02 Greene embraced a low-usage role built on hustle plays, defensive pressure and connective passing. Contemporary discussion regularly highlighted the energy she supplied without needing designed offensive touches. None
Tan White Bench [1.0] 16.0 Low [1.0] 5.0 1.6 1.1 1.2 17.80 White provided instant offense off the bench, leaning on perimeter shooting and transition opportunities. Independent reports described her as a spark plug whose impact often depended on finding rhythm early in her minutes. None
Danielle McCray Bench [1.0] 13.9 Low [1.0] 4.8 2.0 1.2 0.6 17.20 McCray spent much of the year adjusting to the professional game and filling rotational wing minutes. Limited independent coverage focused on her athletic upside while noting that consistency remained a work in progress. None
Kelsey Griffin Bench [1.0] 12.1 Low [1.0] 3.1 2.9 0.5 0.9 14.80 Griffin’s contributions came through rebounding effort and physical play rather than offensive volume. Reports generally viewed her as a high-motor reserve capable of providing dependable frontcourt minutes when called upon. None
Jessica Moore Bench [1.0] 8.1 Low [1.0] 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.0 5.40 Moore saw only a limited reserve role, leaving little contemporary independent coverage beyond brief rotation updates. Available reporting primarily referenced her veteran depth and situational frontcourt experience. None
Chay Shegog Bench [1.0] 3.0 Low [1.0] 1.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 4.00 Shegog appeared only briefly, and independent season reporting was scarce. The limited coverage available centered on her developmental status and potential rather than an established rotation role. None
Team Totals — — — 91.3 40.2 18.6 12.4 390.24 Collective production reflects a veteran-led roster built around Tina Charles’ interior dominance, experienced guard play and a deep frontcourt rotation. WNBA Champion (2011): Asjha Jones

Playoffs

Player Name Role Tier MPG Usage Tier PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) Impact Index Notes Awards
Tina Charles Starter/Star [1.1] 36.0 High [1.2] 18.6 10.0 1.0 3.4 87.12 Connecticut leaned almost every half-court possession through Charles, whose low-post scoring remained the foundation of the offense even as Indiana loaded the paint. Playoff coverage consistently described her as the Sun’s one reliable interior mismatch, with double-teams doing little to reduce her influence on the glass or as a rim protector. (Basketball Reference) WNBA All-Star (2011), All-WNBA First Team (2011)
Kara Lawson Starter/Star [1.1] 35.0 High [1.2] 14.6 4.8 3.8 1.4 65.16 Lawson functioned as the team’s calming presence in the backcourt, spacing the floor while directing late-game offense. Independent postseason coverage noted that Connecticut relied heavily on her decision-making and perimeter shooting whenever Indiana crowded Charles inside. (Basketball Reference) WNBA All-Star (2011)
Asjha Jones Starter/Star [1.1] 28.6 Medium [1.1] 13.6 6.4 2.6 0.8 56.14 Jones quietly filled the complementary frontcourt role, making quick reads instead of forcing offense. Analysts regularly pointed to her ability to stretch Indiana’s defense with mid-range scoring while providing dependable positional defense against experienced post players. (Basketball Reference) None
Allison Hightower Starter/Star [1.1] 26.6 Medium [1.1] 7.8 3.8 3.8 0.4 38.72 Hightower spent much of the series defending on the perimeter while handling secondary playmaking duties. Although her shooting came and went, observers highlighted her willingness to take difficult defensive assignments rather than judging her value strictly by the box score. (Basketball Reference) None
Renee Montgomery Key Contributor [1.05] 24.0 Medium [1.1] 6.8 1.2 3.4 0.4 27.72 Montgomery changed the tempo whenever she entered, attacking gaps instead of settling into a slower half-court style. Playoff discussion often centered on her ability to inject pace and pressure despite inconsistent offensive production during the series. (Basketball Reference) None
Tan White Bench [1.0] 18.2 Low [1.0] 5.0 2.0 0.6 0.8 16.80 White’s assignment was to provide instant scoring from the wing, mainly through spot-up jumpers and transition chances. Independent coverage portrayed her as an energy reserve whose minutes fluctuated with her perimeter rhythm. (Basketball Reference) None
Mistie Bass Bench [1.0] 14.0 Low [1.0] 4.4 3.8 0.2 0.4 17.60 Bass supplied physical frontcourt depth rather than featured offense. Contemporary reporting focused on her rebounding effort, screening and willingness to battle inside against Indiana’s experienced post rotation. (Basketball Reference) None
Kalana Greene Starter/Star [1.1] 12.2 Low [1.0] 1.8 2.2 0.2 0.6 10.56 Greene embraced a defensive-first assignment, chasing opposing guards and helping keep Connecticut’s perimeter structure intact. There was limited postseason coverage devoted specifically to her play, but available reporting emphasized hustle over offensive production. (Basketball Reference) None
Kelsey Griffin Bench [1.0] 4.0 Low [1.0] 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4.00 Griffin appeared only briefly, leaving little independent playoff analysis. The limited coverage available treated her as emergency frontcourt depth rather than part of the regular postseason rotation. (Basketball Reference) None
Danielle McCray Bench [1.0] 4.8 Low [1.0] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 2.60 McCray saw minimal postseason action, and contemporary reporting discussing her playoff role was scarce. Most independent coverage focused on her developmental upside instead of meaningful series contributions. (Basketball Reference) None
Jessica Moore Bench [1.0] 2.0 Low [1.0] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Moore’s lone appearance came in a limited reserve role, resulting in very little independent postseason coverage. The available reporting mentioned her mainly as experienced frontcourt insurance behind the regular rotation. (Basketball Reference) None
Team Totals — — — 72.6 34.4 17.6 10.3 326.42 Connecticut relied on a Charles-led interior attack, veteran guard play from Lawson and a disciplined defensive identity, but Indiana’s defensive game plan gradually limited the supporting cast throughout the playoff series. None