Last Updated on September 2, 2026 by Mat Diekhake

The Atlanta Dream 2023 featured a balanced offense led by Allisha Gray and Rhyne Howard, with Cheyenne Parker providing efficient interior scoring and rebounding. Haley Jones and Aari McDonald contributed as secondary playmakers, while the frontcourt added physicality on the glass. Atlanta’s statistical profile reflects a team that defended well, rebounded consistently, and relied on balanced scoring rather than a single dominant offensive option.

Roster

NO. PLAYER NAME POS HT WT DOB COLLEGE
00 Naz Hillmon F 6-2 190 April 5, 2000 Michigan
2 Aari McDonald G 5-6 141 August 20, 1998 Washington, Arizona
3 Danielle Robinson G 5-9 137 May 10, 1989 Oklahoma
7 Laeticia Amihere F 6-3 185 July 10, 2001 South Carolina
8 Taylor Mikesell G 5-10 150 September 30, 1999 Maryland, Oregon, Ohio State
10 Rhyne Howard G 6-2 175 April 29, 2000 Kentucky
12 Nia Coffey F 6-1 177 June 11, 1995 Northwestern
13 Haley Jones F-G 6-1 202 May 23, 2001 Stanford
15 Allisha Gray G 6-0 167 January 12, 1995 UNC, South Carolina
18 Lorela Cubaj F-C 6-4 200 January 8, 1999 Georgia Tech
21 Iliana Rupert C 6-4 189 July 12, 2001  
23 AD Durr G 5-10 151 April 5, 1997 Louisville
25 Monique Billings F 6-4 190 May 2, 1996 UCLA
32 Cheyenne Parker-Tyus F 6-4 193 August 22, 1992 Middle Tennessee

Regular Season Per Game

PLAYER POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Rhyne Howard 23 39 39 32.9 17.5 4.9 3.5 1.3 0.6 1.9 15.1 5.8 .385 7.2 2.5 .352 4.2 3.3 .788
Allisha Gray 28 38 38 32.7 17.1 4.9 3.1 1.1 0.4 1.9 12.4 5.8 .465 3.1 1.1 .356 5.4 4.4 .824
Cheyenne Parker-Tyus 30 40 38 26.7 15.0 6.7 1.8 1.1 1.5 2.3 12.0 5.8 .482 1.4 0.4 .278 3.7 3.0 .829
Nia Coffey 28 31 31 21.9 6.9 4.8 1.5 0.5 1.2 1.4 6.2 2.7 .432 2.6 1.1 .402 0.8 0.5 .625
Aari McDonald 24 24 9 23.5 7.9 2.0 3.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 6.8 2.8 .402 3.3 1.0 .321 1.8 1.3 .762
Danielle Robinson 34 32 27 21.6 5.8 2.2 3.3 0.7 0.1 1.3 4.8 2.2 .461 1.0 0.3 .290 1.5 1.1 .750
Monique Billings 27 39 9 16.7 4.8 5.0 0.8 0.4 0.3 1.0 4.3 1.7 .407 0.1 0.0 .000 1.6 1.3 .836
AD Durr 26 36 0 10.9 4.8 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.8 4.5 1.7 .380 1.6 0.5 .322 1.1 0.8 .769
Naz Hillmon 23 40 3 13.5 4.1 3.4 0.7 0.2 0.1 1.0 2.9 1.5 .509 0.0 0.0 .000 1.4 1.2 .852
Haley Jones 22 40 6 14.6 3.7 2.4 2.3 0.4 0.3 1.4 4.2 1.4 .337 0.7 0.2 .214 1.0 0.8 .756
Laeticia Amihere 21 21 0 7.0 2.7 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 2.0 0.8 .405 0.0 0.0 .000 2.0 1.0 .537
Iliana Rupert 21 20 0 7.9 1.8 2.0 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.7 0.6 .353 1.1 0.3 .273 0.4 0.3 .625
Taylor Mikesell 23 6 0 4.8 2.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.8 .500 1.2 0.5 .429 0.7 0.7 1.000
Lorela Cubaj 24 3 0 6.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 .000 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  

Playoff Per Game

PLAYER POS AGE GP GS MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TOV FGA FGM FG% 3PA 3PM 3P% FTA FTM FT%
Rhyne Howard 23 2 2 37.5 28.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 25.5 11.0 .431 12.0 5.5 .458 1.5 1.0 .667
Allisha Gray 28 2 2 36.0 20.0 7.0 4.0 1.5 0.5 3.5 16.5 7.0 .424 6.5 2.5 .385 5.0 3.5 .700
Cheyenne Parker-Tyus 30 2 2 33.5 13.0 6.5 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.5 15.5 5.0 .323 3.0 1.5 .500 2.0 1.5 .750
Aari McDonald 24 2 0 18.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 0.0 2.5 5.5 1.5 .273 2.0 0.5 .250 0.0 0.0  
Monique Billings 27 2 2 23.5 4.5 7.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 3.5 1.0 .286 0.0 0.0   4.0 2.5 .625
Danielle Robinson 34 2 2 22.0 2.5 1.5 4.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 .200 0.0 0.0   2.0 1.5 .750
AD Durr 26 2 0 5.0 2.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 .500 0.0 0.0   1.0 1.0 1.000
Haley Jones 22 1 0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.000 0.0 0.0   2.0 2.0 1.000
Naz Hillmon 23 2 0 14.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.000 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  
Iliana Rupert 21 1 0 14.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.000 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  
Laeticia Amihere 21 1 0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 .000 0.0 0.0   2.0 0.0 .000

HeatingUp Impact Index: Regular Season Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Rhyne Howard Starter/Star (1.1) 32.9 High (1.2) 17.5 4.9 3.5 1.9 73.39 Atlanta’s offense consistently flowed through Howard as the primary perimeter creator and high-volume three-point threat. Opposing defenses routinely loaded up on her off the ball, yet she still carried the toughest scoring assignments while remaining an active team defender, reflecting the trust Tanisha Wright placed in her two-way impact during the Dream’s playoff return. (Wikipedia) WNBA All-Star (2023)
Allisha Gray Starter/Star (1.1) 32.7 High (1.2) 17.1 4.9 3.1 1.5 70.22 Gray brought balance to Atlanta’s backcourt with efficient scoring rather than pure shot volume. Coverage throughout the season highlighted her ability to attack closeouts, defend multiple positions and stabilize the offense, making her one of the league’s most reliable two-way wings. (Peachtree Hoops) WNBA All-Star (2023); WNBA Skills Challenge Champion (2023); WNBA Three-Point Contest Champion (2023)
Cheyenne Parker-Tyus Starter/Star (1.1) 26.7 High (1.2) 15.0 6.7 1.8 2.6 68.90 Parker-Tyus anchored Atlanta’s interior with physical finishing, rim protection and rebounding. Independent season coverage regularly pointed to her frontcourt presence as a major reason the Dream became a more competitive defensive team while complementing the club’s perimeter scorers. (Wikipedia) WNBA All-Star (2023)
Nia Coffey Starter/Star (1.1) 21.9 Medium (1.1) 6.9 4.8 1.5 1.7 36.06 Coffey filled a connective role rather than chasing touches, spacing the floor and defending bigger forwards. Analysts frequently noted that her versatility allowed Atlanta to switch more comfortably without sacrificing frontcourt mobility. (Reddit) None
Aari McDonald Key Contributor (1.05) 23.5 Medium (1.1) 7.9 2.0 3.0 0.6 31.19 McDonald supplied pace and on-ball pressure whenever she entered the backcourt rotation. Even while moving between starting and reserve duties, her ability to change tempo and attack the rim gave Atlanta a different offensive look. (Wikipedia) None
Danielle Robinson Key Contributor (1.05) 21.6 Medium (1.1) 5.8 2.2 3.3 0.8 27.95 Robinson operated as a veteran table-setter whose value extended beyond the box score. Reporting during the season emphasized her leadership, defensive communication and willingness to organize younger teammates in half-court sets. (Wikipedia) None
Monique Billings Key Contributor (1.05) 16.7 Low (1.0) 4.8 5.0 0.8 0.7 23.73 Billings embraced an energy role built around offensive rebounding, hustle plays and defensive activity. Her production often arrived in short bursts that helped Atlanta maintain physicality when the starters rested. None
Haley Jones Bench (1.0) 14.6 Low (1.0) 3.7 2.4 2.3 0.7 18.20 As a rookie, Jones was used more as a secondary playmaker than a traditional scorer. Coverage frequently described the season as a developmental year while coaches experimented with her size and passing in multiple backcourt roles. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2023)
Naz Hillmon Bench (1.0) 13.5 Low (1.0) 4.1 3.4 0.7 0.3 17.00 Hillmon provided dependable frontcourt minutes through rebounding and physical interior defense. Her willingness to do the low-profile work helped stabilize second-unit lineups despite limited offensive usage. None
AD Durr Bench (1.0) 10.9 Low (1.0) 4.8 1.1 0.7 0.4 14.00 Durr’s role centered on instant offense from the perimeter, although consistent rhythm proved difficult in limited minutes. Independent coverage noted Atlanta’s search for additional wing shooting throughout the season. None
Iliana Rupert Bench (1.0) 7.9 Low (1.0) 1.8 2.0 0.5 0.8 10.20 Rupert appeared in a limited reserve role, flashing stretch-big skills without earning a regular rotation spot. Contemporary independent coverage discussing her season was limited. None
Laeticia Amihere Bench (1.0) 7.0 Low (1.0) 2.7 1.0 0.2 0.6 9.00 Atlanta used Amihere primarily as a developmental frontcourt prospect, valuing her athletic tools while gradually introducing her to WNBA defensive responsibilities. None
Taylor Mikesell Bench (1.0) 4.8 Low (1.0) 2.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 6.80 Mikesell’s brief appearances showcased the outside shooting that defined her college career, but opportunities remained limited because of Atlanta’s established veteran wing rotation. Contemporary independent coverage was limited. None
Lorela Cubaj Bench (1.0) 6.3 Low (1.0) 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.3 5.20 Cubaj saw only a handful of minutes during the regular season. Independent reporting specific to her 2023 campaign was sparse, with most discussion focusing on her depth role and defensive effort. None
TOTALS   248.1   111.9 44.6 23.8 12.6      

HeatingUp Impact Index: Playoff Team Impact Spotlight

PLAYER NAME ROLE TIER MPG USAGE TIER PPG RPG APG STK (SPG + BPG) IMPACT INDEX NOTES AWARDS
Rhyne Howard Starter/Star (1.1) 37.5 High (1.2) 28.5 3.5 2.0 2.5 96.10 Atlanta leaned almost every half-court possession toward Howard, asking her to create against Dallas’ best defenders while maintaining heavy defensive responsibility on the perimeter. National playoff coverage described her shot-making as the reason the Dream stayed competitive, particularly after her 36-point opener kept the series within reach despite the eventual sweep. (Wikipedia) WNBA All-Star (2023)
Allisha Gray Starter/Star (1.1) 36.0 High (1.2) 20.0 7.0 4.0 2.0 87.12 Gray functioned as Atlanta’s secondary creator rather than simply a spot-up wing, attacking mismatches and helping initiate offense when Dallas trapped Howard. Independent playoff reporting highlighted her composure and physical downhill play as one of the few consistent positives for the Dream. (Wikipedia) WNBA All-Star (2023); WNBA Skills Challenge Champion (2023); WNBA Three-Point Contest Champion (2023)
Cheyenne Parker-Tyus Starter/Star (1.1) 33.5 High (1.2) 13.0 6.5 2.0 3.0 64.15 Parker-Tyus battled through constant interior pressure, serving as Atlanta’s primary screener and defensive anchor against Dallas’ size. Although the shooting numbers dipped, postseason analysis still pointed to her physicality and rim protection as essential parts of the Dream’s game plan. (Wikipedia) WNBA All-Star (2023)
Monique Billings Key Contributor (1.05) 23.5 Low (1.0) 4.5 7.0 0.0 0.5 25.20 Billings embraced a hustle-first assignment, chasing offensive rebounds and providing extra possessions rather than looking for touches. Her activity around the glass stood out even as Atlanta struggled to generate consistent offense. None
Danielle Robinson Key Contributor (1.05) 22.0 Low (1.0) 2.5 1.5 4.0 1.0 18.90 Robinson’s responsibility centered on organizing the offense and defending opposing guards. Even with limited scoring, her veteran decision-making remained important as Atlanta tried to settle the tempo against Dallas’ pressure. None
Aari McDonald Key Contributor (1.05) 18.0 Low (1.0) 3.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 16.80 McDonald supplied pace off the bench and looked to change the rhythm with aggressive drives. Her playoff role was more about injecting energy than carrying the offense, a task noted throughout the season by independent observers. None
Naz Hillmon Bench (1.0) 14.0 Low (1.0) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 9.00 Hillmon filled a complementary frontcourt role built around defensive positioning and rebounding. Opportunities were limited, but she continued doing the small interior jobs that rarely appear in scoring totals. None
Iliana Rupert Bench (1.0) 14.0 Low (1.0) 2.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 12.00 Rupert briefly added size and spacing off the bench. Contemporary independent playoff coverage discussing her individual role was limited, with most reporting focusing on Atlanta’s shortened rotation. None
Haley Jones Bench (1.0) 3.0 Low (1.0) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.00 Jones appeared only briefly as Atlanta relied heavily on its veteran backcourt. Independent playoff discussion of her individual minutes was limited because of the condensed postseason rotation. WNBA All-Rookie Team (2023)
AD Durr Bench (1.0) 5.0 Low (1.0) 2.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 5.00 Durr received only short stretches as a reserve scorer. Contemporary independent playoff coverage was limited, reflecting a minimal role in the two-game series. None
Laeticia Amihere Bench (1.0) 3.0 Low (1.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Amihere’s lone appearance came in limited developmental minutes. Independent postseason reporting specific to her role was scarce because Atlanta shortened its rotation during the series. None
TOTALS   212.5   81.0 31.5 17.0 11.5